Liver function and portal‐systemic shunting quantified by the oral cholate challenge test and risk for large oesophageal varices

Summary Background The quantitative HepQuant SHUNT test of liver function and physiology generates a disease severity index (DSI) that correlates with risk for clinical complications, such as large oesophageal varices (LEVs). A derivative test, HepQuant DuO, generates an equivalent DSI and simplifie...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAlimentary pharmacology & therapeutics Vol. 60; no. 2; pp. 246 - 256
Main Authors Hassanein, Tarek, Keaveny, Andrew P., Mantry, Parvez, Smith, Alastair D., McRae, Michael P., Kittelson, John, Helmke, Steve, Everson, Gregory T., Bambha, Kiran, Fuchs, Michael, Gilroy, Richard K., Reddy, K. Rajender, Shiffman, Mitchell L., Rahimi, Robert S., Hellstern, Paul A., Hill, John M., Kayali, Zeid, Denham, Doug, Qureshi, Kamran, Smith, Brian, Lucas, K. Jean, Leise, Michael D., Glover, Sarah, Amankonah, Thomas D., Patel, Buck, Reiss, Gary, Newman, Fredric B., Bhagat, Vishal K., Syn, Wing‐Kin, Mena, Edward, Kohli, Anita, Ravendhran, Natarajan, Strobel, James
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.07.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Summary Background The quantitative HepQuant SHUNT test of liver function and physiology generates a disease severity index (DSI) that correlates with risk for clinical complications, such as large oesophageal varices (LEVs). A derivative test, HepQuant DuO, generates an equivalent DSI and simplifies testing by requiring only oral administration of the test solution and two blood samples at 20 and 60 min. Aims Since the DSIs measured from DuO and SHUNT are equivalent, we compared the diagnostic performance for large oesophageal varices (LEVs) between the DSIs measured from DuO and SHUNT tests. Methods This study combined the data from two prospectively conducted US studies: HALT‐C and SHUNT‐V. A total of 455 subjects underwent both the SHUNT test and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). Results DSI scores correlated with the probability of LEVs (p < 0.001) and demonstrated a stepwise increase from healthy lean controls without liver disease to subjects with chronic liver disease and no, small or large varices. Furthermore, a cutoff of DSI ≤ 18.3 from DuO had a sensitivity of 0.98 (missing only one case) and, if applied to the endoscopy (EGD) decision, would have prevented 188 EGDs (41.3%). The AUROC for DSI from DuO did not differ from that of the reference SHUNT test method (0.82 versus 0.81, p = 0.3500). Conclusions DSI from HepQuant DuO links liver function and physiology to the risk of LEVs across a wide spectrum of patient characteristics, disease aetiologies and liver disease severity. DuO is minimally invasive, easy to administer, quantitative and may aid the decision to avoid or perform EGD for LEVs. DSI from HepQuant DuO links liver function and physiology to the risk of LEVs across a wide spectrum of patient characteristics, disease aetiologies and liver disease severity. DuO is minimally invasive, easy to administer, quantitative and may aid the decision to avoid or perform EGD for LEVs.
Bibliography:The Handling Editor for this article was Professor Gideon Hirschfield, and it was accepted for publication after full peer‐review.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0269-2813
1365-2036
1365-2036
DOI:10.1111/apt.18054