Clinical variability of the GJB4:c.35G > A gene variant: a study of a large Brazilian erythrokeratodermia pedigree

Background Erythrokeratodermas are a heterogeneous group of keratinization disorders. They are inherited in both autosomal dominant and autosomal recessive pattern. Erythrokeratoderma variabilis et progressive (EKVP) is a disorder caused by variations in genes that codify connexins (GJA1, GJB3, GJB4...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of dermatology Vol. 59; no. 6; pp. 722 - 725
Main Authors Oliveira, Renan Tironi G., Christofolini, Denise Maria, Criado, Paulo R., Lacaz Martins, Eduardo, Kelsell, David, Machado Filho, Carlos D’Apparecida Santos
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.06.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Erythrokeratodermas are a heterogeneous group of keratinization disorders. They are inherited in both autosomal dominant and autosomal recessive pattern. Erythrokeratoderma variabilis et progressive (EKVP) is a disorder caused by variations in genes that codify connexins (GJA1, GJB3, GJB4). The distinction between different phenotypes is not always simple. Age of presentation varies from birth to adulthood; stationary or migratory erythematous plaques associated with nonmigratory hyperkeratosis are characteristic of this disorder. Nails, hair, and teeth are not affected. Methods In order to describe the clinical phenotypes and molecular findings in a large Brazilian pedigree affected by erythrokeratoderma, we performed a clinical evaluation of four patients with different presentations of erythrokeratoderma from the same family, in which there are 35 affected members distributed in six generations. Genomic DNA evaluation by Sanger sequencing of GJB3 and GJB4 was performed in two affected family members with different phenotypes. Results Clinical heterogeneity in affected patients was remarkable. In patients investigated with genetic testing, a heterozygous pathogenic gene variant in the GJB4 (gap junction protein beta‐4) gene was found positive for GJB4:c.35G>A (rsrs80358211). One patient also presented a synonymous variant in GJB3:c.357C>T (rs41310442). Conclusion Variants in GJB4 are classically associated with Erythrokeratodermia variabilis, but there is remarkable clinical heterogeneity. Our observation that the same variant caused different phenotypes within the same family corroborates clinical heterogeneity and suggests that other genes that compose the genetic background exert some influence on the disease phenotype.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Case Study-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-4
content type line 23
ObjectType-Report-1
ObjectType-Article-3
ISSN:0011-9059
1365-4632
DOI:10.1111/ijd.14894