Differences in Perceptions of and Practices Regarding Treatment of Alcohol Use Disorders Among VA Primary Care Providers in Urban and Rural Clinics
Background Effective behavioral and pharmacological treatments are available and recommended for patients with alcohol use disorders (AUD) but rarely received. Barriers to receipt and provision of evidence‐based AUD treatments delivered by specialists may be greatest in rural areas. Methods A target...
Saved in:
Published in | The Journal of rural health Vol. 34; no. 4; pp. 359 - 368 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.09.2018
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background
Effective behavioral and pharmacological treatments are available and recommended for patients with alcohol use disorders (AUD) but rarely received. Barriers to receipt and provision of evidence‐based AUD treatments delivered by specialists may be greatest in rural areas.
Methods
A targeted subanalysis of qualitative interview data collected from primary care providers at 5 Veterans Affairs clinics was conducted to identify differences in provider perceptions and practices regarding AUD treatment across urban and rural clinics. Key contacts were used to recruit 24 providers from 3 “urban” clinics at medical centers and 2 “rural” community‐based outpatient clinics. Providers completed 30‐minute semistructured interviews, which were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using inductive content analysis.
Results
Thirteen urban and 11 rural providers participated. Urban and rural providers differed regarding referral practices and in perceptions of availability and utility of specialty addictions treatment. Urban providers described referral to specialty treatment as standard practice, while rural providers reported substantial barriers to specialty care access and infrequent specialty care referral. Urban providers viewed specialty addictions treatment as accessible and comprehensive, and perceived addictions providers as “experts” and collaborators, whereas rural providers perceived inadequate support from the health care system for AUD treatment. Urban providers desired greater integration with specialty addictions care while rural providers wanted access to local addictions treatment resources.
Conclusions
Providers in rural settings view referral to specialty addictions treatment as impractical and resources inadequate to treat AUD. Additional work is needed to understand the unique needs of rural clinics and decrease barriers to AUD treatment. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Disclosures This study was funded by a seed grant from VA Puget Sound Health Services Research & Development. The parent study was funded by a VA Quality Enhancement Research Initiative Rapid Response Project (RRP 12–528; Williams PI). Dr. Williams is supported by a Career Development Award from VA Health Services Research & Development (CDA 12–276). Acknowledgments Funding The authors gratefully acknowledge the participants of this study for generously allowing us to solicit and report on their perspectives. Views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the US Government, Department of Veterans Affairs, or the University of Washington. All authors report no competing interests. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0890-765X 1748-0361 |
DOI: | 10.1111/jrh.12293 |