Synchrony in head and neck surgery: Feasibility and outcomes of simultaneous scapular free flap reconstruction

Background The scapula free flap is a versatile option in head and neck reconstruction but is less amenable to simultaneous harvest and ablation. Methods Retrospective series (2015–2021) of consecutive scapula flaps. Cases categorized as simultaneous versus sequential, compared for operative time, o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHead & neck Vol. 44; no. 3; pp. 760 - 769
Main Authors Deane, Emily C., Liu, Alice Q., Nguyen, Sally, Anderson, Donald W., Durham, James Scott, Prisman, Eitan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.03.2022
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background The scapula free flap is a versatile option in head and neck reconstruction but is less amenable to simultaneous harvest and ablation. Methods Retrospective series (2015–2021) of consecutive scapula flaps. Cases categorized as simultaneous versus sequential, compared for operative time, oncological and patient‐reported outcomes. Results Seventy consecutive scapula free flaps were performed (n = 21 simultaneous, n = 49 sequential). Mandible reconstruction was performed in 51.0% and 61.9% of sequential and simultaneous cases, respectively; 49.0% and 38.1% addressed bony maxillary defects. Simultaneous surgery reduced operative time by 37.9% (151 min, p < 0.00001) and there were fewer tracheostomies performed (p < 0.005). Rates of positive margins and free flap compromise were equivalent (n = 1, 4.8% vs. n = 2, 4.1%). There was no difference in patient‐reported outcomes. Conclusions This series demonstrates feasibility, efficacy, and outcomes of bony scapula reconstruction of maxillofacial defects comparing simultaneous and sequential approaches. Benefits of the two‐team approach are highlighted including decreased operative time.
Bibliography:Funding information
Section Editor
Mark K. Wax
Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1043-3074
1097-0347
DOI:10.1002/hed.26963