Non‐celiac gluten or wheat sensitivity: It's complicated

In the last 30 years, non‐celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) has emerged as an intriguing and controversial topic in gastroenterology. The diagnosis of NCGS/NCWS requires a symptomatic reaction to gluten, or wheat‐containing food, and remission of symptoms with gluten or wheat challenge, in patients i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNeurogastroenterology and motility Vol. 30; no. 8; pp. e13392 - n/a
Main Authors Pinto‐Sanchez, Maria I., Verdu, Elena F.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.08.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In the last 30 years, non‐celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) has emerged as an intriguing and controversial topic in gastroenterology. The diagnosis of NCGS/NCWS requires a symptomatic reaction to gluten, or wheat‐containing food, and remission of symptoms with gluten or wheat challenge, in patients in whom celiac disease and wheat allergy have been excluded. There have been several randomized clinical trials (RCT) addressing this issue which have produced controversial results. In this issue of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, a double‐blind placebo‐controlled randomized trial in patients with suspected NCGS on GFD, did not reproduce symptoms after gluten intake compared to placebo. This mini‐review addresses outstanding issues related to the diagnosis of NCGS/NCWS as well as areas of interest for future studies that could explain, in part, the controversy in this area.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:1350-1925
1365-2982
DOI:10.1111/nmo.13392