Prophylactic Use of Biologic Mesh in Ileal Conduit (PUBMIC): A Randomized Clinical Trial
Purpose:We assessed the effect of prophylactic biologic mesh on parastomal hernia (PSH) development in patients undergoing cystectomy and ileal conduit (IC).Materials and Methods:This phase 3, randomized, controlled trial (NCT02439060) included 146 patients who underwent cystectomy and IC at the Uni...
Saved in:
Published in | The Journal of urology Vol. 211; no. 6; pp. 743 - 753 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Philadelphia, PA
Wolters Kluwer
01.06.2024
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Purpose:We assessed the effect of prophylactic biologic mesh on parastomal hernia (PSH) development in patients undergoing cystectomy and ileal conduit (IC).Materials and Methods:This phase 3, randomized, controlled trial (NCT02439060) included 146 patients who underwent cystectomy and IC at the University of Southern California between 2015 and 2021. Follow-ups were physical exam and CT every 4 to 6 months up to 2 years. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive FlexHD prophylactic biological mesh using sublay intraperitoneal technique vs standard IC. The primary end point was time to radiological PSH, and secondary outcomes included clinical PSH with/without surgical intervention and mesh-related complications.Results:The 2 arms were similar in terms of baseline clinical features. All surgeries and mesh placements were performed without any intraoperative complications. Median operative time was 31 minutes longer in patients who received mesh, yet with no statistically significant difference (363 vs 332 minutes, P = .16). With a median follow-up of 24 months, radiological and clinical PSHs were detected in 37 (18 mesh recipients vs 19 controls) and 16 (8 subjects in both arms) patients, with a median time to radiological and clinical PSH of 8.3 and 15.5 months, respectively. No definite mesh-related adverse events were reported. Five patients (3 in the mesh and 2 in the control arm) required surgical PSH repair. Radiological PSH-free survival rates in the mesh and control groups were 74% vs 75% at 1 year and 69% vs 62% at 2 years.Conclusions:Implementation of biologic mesh at the time of IC construction is safe without significant protective effects within 2 years following surgery. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Corresponding Author: Hooman Djaladat, MD, MS, USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, 1441 Eastlake Ave, Suite 7416, Los Angeles, CA 90089 (djaladat@med.usc.eduRecusals: Dr Gill is a section editor and New Technology, Digital Health, and Artificial Intelligence feature editor for The Journal of Urology® and was recused from the editorial and peer review processes. Dr Daneshmand is a member of the editorial board for The Journal of Urology® and was recused from the editorial and peer review processes. Dr Samplaski and Dr Cacciamani, assistant editors of The Journal of Urology®, were recused from the editorial and peer review processes due to affiliation with the University of Southern California, Los Angeles.Funding/Support: This work was supported by the Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation.Conflict of Interest Disclosures: The Authors have no conflicts of interest related to this paper to disclose.Ethics Statement: This study received Institutional Review Board approval (IRB No. HS-15-00044).Author Contributions:Conception and design: Djaladat, Duddalwar, Aldana.Data analysis and interpretation: Ghoreifi, Sheybaee Moghaddam, Cai, Djaladat, Duddalwar.Data acquisition: Ghoreifi, Miranda, Tejura, Duddalwar.Drafting the manuscript: Ghoreifi, Djaladat.Critical revision of the manuscript for scientific and factual content: Sotelo, Gill, Bhanvadia, Schuckman, Desai, Aron, Daneshmand, Duddalwar, Djaladat.Statistical analysis: Cai.Supervision: Djaladat, Duddalwar.Data Availability: All data discussed in this manuscript are included in the main manuscript text or supplementary materials. Any other data are available on request from the corresponding author.Editor's Note: This article is the second of 5 published in this issue for which Category 1 CME credits can be earned. Instructions for obtaining credits are given with the questions on pages 821 and 822. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
ISSN: | 0022-5347 1527-3792 1527-3792 |
DOI: | 10.1097/JU.0000000000003902 |