Tissue‐inhibitors of metalloproteinase‐1 and vascular‐endothelial growth‐factor in severe haemophilia A children on low dose prophylactic recombinant factor VIII: Relation to subclinical arthropathy

Background Subclinical synovitis occur long before clinical haemophilic arthropathy (HA). New biomarkers are needed for early detection of HA. Aim To compare the levels of tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase‐1 (TIMP‐1) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)in severe haemophilia A boys on p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHaemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia Vol. 26; no. 4; pp. 607 - 614
Main Authors Andrawes, Nevine Gamal, Saker, Hossam Mousa, Salah El‐Din, Nouran Yousef, Abd Elhakim Hussain, Mervat
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.07.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Subclinical synovitis occur long before clinical haemophilic arthropathy (HA). New biomarkers are needed for early detection of HA. Aim To compare the levels of tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase‐1 (TIMP‐1) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)in severe haemophilia A boys on prophylaxis and on‐demand therapy to healthy boys and correlate them with the haemophilia joint health score (HJHS) & the Denver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scale; hence, determine their values in early detection of HA. Methods Haemophilia joint health score, serum TIMP‐1, VEGF and Denver MRI score were assessed in 50 boys with severe haemophilia A (31 on prophylactic factor VIII therapy (62%) with a dose of 15 IU/kg/twice weekly) and 50 age‐matched healthy boys. Results Boys with severe haemophilia A had significantly higher TIMP‐1 240 ng/mL, SD200‐350 (P < .001) and VEGF 600 pg/mL, SD400‐1100 (P < .001). Their mean HJHS was 4.5 ± 3.0 (0‐11) and their mean Denver MRI score was 5.55 ± 1.6 (2.00‐8.00). A significant positive correlation was found between TIMP‐1 and VEGF (P < .001), BMI Z‐score (P = .029), HJHS (P = .041)and total MRI score (<.001). Significant correlations were found between VEGF and age (P < .001), HJHS (P = .003) and total MRI score (P < .001). Boys with severe haemophilia A on prophylaxis therapy had significantly lower HJHS (P = .021), VEGF (P < .001), TIMP‐1 (P = .002) and total MRI score (P = .021) than those on on‐demand therapy. Receiver operating characteristic curve, defined a cut‐off value of 160 ng/mL for TIMP‐1 with a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 60% and that of 350 pg/mL for VEGF with a sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 88% for discrimination between severe haemophilia A and healthy boys. Conclusion Vascular endothelial growth factor and TIMP‐1 can be used for early detection of HA. Further prospective studies should include larger study populations. In addition, studies should address the role of various anti‐VEGFs as potential therapy for HA and their impact on prevention and treatment of HA.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1351-8216
1365-2516
DOI:10.1111/hae.14041