Estimation of genetic parameters for reproductive traits in connectedness groups of Duroc, Landrace and Yorkshire pigs in China

• Published in: Journal of animal breeding and genetics (1986) Vol. 137; no. 2; pp. 211 - 222
• Main Authors: Zhang, Suoyu, Zhang, Jinxin, Olasege, Babatunde Shittu, Ma, Peipei, Qiu, Xiaotian, Gao, Hong, Wang, Changcun, Wang, Yuan, Zhang, Qin, Yang, Hongjie, Wang, Zhigang, Ding, Xiangdong, Pan, Yuchun
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Germany Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.03.2020
• Subjects: Animal husbandry; Animal models; connectedness groups; Estimates; Farms; Genetic analysis; Genetic factors; Genetic improvement; genetic parameters; Hogs; Litter; Litter size; Livestock; Livestock breeding; Parameter estimation; pigs; reproductive traits; Swine; China; pigs; connectedness groups; genetic parameters; reproductive traits
• ISSN: 0931-2668; 1439-0388
• DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12431

The objective of this study was to estimate group‐ and breed‐specific genetic parameters for reproductive traits in Chinese Duroc, Landrace, and Yorkshire populations. Records for reproductive traits between April 1998 and December 2017 from 92 nucleus pig breeding farms, which were involved in the China Swine Genetic Improvement Program, were analysed. Due to weak genetic connectedness across all farms, connectedness groups consisting of related farms were used. Three, two and four connectedness groups for Duroc, Landrace and Yorkshire were firstly established according to the genetic connectedness rating among farms. For each connectedness group a five‐trait animal model was implemented, and via restricted maximum likelihood procedure the genetic parameters were estimated for five reproductive traits i.e., total number born (TNB), number born alive (NBA), litter weight at farrowing (LWF), farrowing interval (FI) and age at first farrowing (AFF). The average of heritabilities among connectedness groups ranged from .01 (for FI in Yorkshire) to .30 (for AFF in Duroc). Estimates of repeatability for litter traits ranged from .14 to .20 and were consistent for each breed, and for FI, the estimates varied from .01 to .11 across breeds and groups. The estimated genetic correlations among litter traits (i.e., TNB, NBA and LWF) were all significantly high (>.56) and similar across breeds. Averaged genetic correlations over three breeds were −.25, −.27, −.18, −.04, −.10, −.02, and .28 for FI‐TNB, FI‐NBA, FI‐LWF, AFF‐TNB, AFF‐NBA, AFF‐LWF and FI‐AFF, respectively. The standard errors of the estimates were all very low (<0.01) in most situations. Results from this study suggest that selection based on TNB which is currently used in dam line selection index can improve NBA and LWF simultaneously. However, care should be taken on FI and AFF as they are both greatly influenced by non‐genetic factors such as management and measurement.