Lung Cancer Surgical Regionalization Disproportionately Worsens Travel Distance for Rural Patients
Purpose Major cancer surgeries have regionalized to fewer and higher‐volume hospitals, with the goal of improving the quality of surgical care. However, regionalization may have negative effects on geographic access to care. We hypothesize that lung cancer patients have been traveling further for su...
Saved in:
Published in | The Journal of rural health Vol. 36; no. 4; pp. 496 - 505 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.09.2020
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Purpose
Major cancer surgeries have regionalized to fewer and higher‐volume hospitals, with the goal of improving the quality of surgical care. However, regionalization may have negative effects on geographic access to care. We hypothesize that lung cancer patients have been traveling further for surgery over time as regionalization has occurred, and this increased travel has primarily impacted rural patients.
Methods
A North Carolina all‐payer state discharge database was used to capture discharges from 2005 to 2015 for patients undergoing lung cancer resection. Changes in patterns of care over time in high‐volume centers (HVC) were examined. Adjusted patient straight‐line travel distance was estimated over time and stratified by rural‐urban location.
Findings
The number of hospitals performing lung cancer resections decreased from 49 to 31 over the study period (P = .0006), and the proportion of patients receiving care at HVC increased from 23% to 44% (P < .0001). Rural patient travel distance increased over time by 8.5 miles (95% CI: 0.56‐17.10, P = .048), from 45.1 to 53.6 miles. There was no change in urban patient travel distance. The difference in adjusted travel distance between rural and urban patients nearly doubled from 2005 to 2015 (9.6 to 17.9 miles,P < .0001).
Conclusion
In North Carolina, lung cancer surgical regionalization occurred over the study period and was accompanied by increases in travel distance for rural patients only. Further work is needed to determine the effects of greater travel distance on patterns of cancer care for rural patients. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Funding information The authors have no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose. Acknowledgement Dr. Herb is partially supported by a National Service Research Award Pre‐Doctoral/Post‐Doctoral Traineeship from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality sponsored by the Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Grant No. 5T32 HS000032. : Disclosure The database infrastructure used for this project was funded by the Department of Health Policy and Management, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health; the Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, UNC; the CER Strategic Initiative of UNC's Clinical Translational Science Award (UL1TR001111); and the UNC School of Medicine. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0890-765X 1748-0361 |
DOI: | 10.1111/jrh.12440 |