Isolation and Characterization of Porcine Endocardial Endothelial Cells

• Published in: Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods Vol. 29; no. 8; p. 371
• Main Authors: Brown, Kathleen N, Phan, Hong Kim T, Jui, Elysa L, Kang, Marci K, Connell, Jennifer P, Keswani, Sundeep G, Grande-Allen, K Jane
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.08.2023
• Subjects: Animals; Cell Separation - methods; Cells, Cultured; Endocardium - metabolism; Endothelium, Vascular; Heart; Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells - metabolism; Humans; Swine; phenotype; endothelial cells; endocardial; behavior; cell isolation
• ISSN: 1937-3392
• DOI: 10.1089/ten.tec.2023.0009

The heart contains diverse endothelial cell types. We sought to characterize the endocardial endothelial cells (EECs), which line the chambers of the heart. EECs are relatively understudied, yet their dysregulation can lead to various cardiac pathologies. Due to the lack of commercial availability of these cells, we reported our protocol for isolating EECs from porcine hearts and for establishing an EEC population through cell sorting. In addition, we compared the EEC phenotype and fundamental behaviors to a well-studied endothelial cell line, human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). The EECs stained positively for classic phenotypic markers such as CD31, von Willebrand Factor, and vascular endothelial (VE) cadherin. The EECs proliferated more quickly than HUVECs at 48 h (1310 ± 251 cells vs. 597 ± 130 cells,  = 0.0361) and at 96 h (2873 ± 257 cells vs. 1714 ± 342 cells,  = 0.0002). Yet EECs migrated more slowly than HUVECs to cover a scratch wound at 4 h (5% ± 1% wound closure vs. 25% ± 3% wound closure,  < 0.0001), 8 h (15% ± 4% wound closure vs. 51% ± 12% wound closure,  < 0.0001), and 24 h (70% ± 11% wound closure vs. 90% ± 3% wound closure,  < 0.0001). Finally, the EECs maintained their endothelial phenotype by positive expression of CD31 through more than a dozen passages (three populations of EECs showing 97% ± 1% CD31 cells in over 14 passages). In contrast, the HUVECs showed significantly reduced CD31 expression over high passages (80% ± 11% CD31 cells over 14 passages). These important phenotypic differences between EECs and HUVECs highlight the need for researchers to utilize the most relevant cell types when studying or modeling diseases of interest.