Interventional radiology and the musculoskeletal system

Imaging-guided interventional procedures are becoming increasingly important in clinical rheumatology, since arthrocentesis of peripheral joints and the spine, as well as soft tissue injections, have a high rate of para-articular localisation when performed as blind techniques. Ultrasound-guided nee...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBest practice & research. Clinical rheumatology Vol. 18; no. 6; pp. 945 - 956
Main Authors Weidner, Sven, Kellner, Wolfgang, Kellner, Herbert
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier Ltd 01.12.2004
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Imaging-guided interventional procedures are becoming increasingly important in clinical rheumatology, since arthrocentesis of peripheral joints and the spine, as well as soft tissue injections, have a high rate of para-articular localisation when performed as blind techniques. Ultrasound-guided needle placement is the method of choice for interventional procedures on peripheral joints and for soft tissue injections. Fluoroscopy and computed tomography (CT) are not recommended for these indications due to the application of ionising radiation and the high procedural effort. By contrast, CT and magnetic resonance imaging are preferred for a variety of percutaneous procedures on the spine and sacroiliac joints. The increasing use of these methods for interventional purposes should improve both technical and procedural quality, thus ensuring cost-effectiveness and patient safety.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:1521-6942
1532-1770
DOI:10.1016/j.berh.2004.05.011