Aboveground biomass responses to organic matter removal, soil compaction, and competing vegetation control on 20-year mixed conifer plantations in California

• Published in: Forest ecology and management Vol. 401; pp. 341 - 353
• Main Authors: Zhang, Jianwei, Busse, Matt D., Young, David H., Fiddler, Gary O., Sherlock, Joseph W., TenPas, Jeff D.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V 01.10.2017
• Subjects: Aboveground biomass accumulation; Competing vegetation; Harvesting impacts; Long-term soil productivity; Mixed conifer plantation; Soil disturbance; Mixed conifer plantation; Aboveground biomass accumulation; Competing vegetation; Long-term soil productivity; Soil disturbance; Harvesting impacts
• ISSN: 0378-1127; 1872-7042
• DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.07.023

•Biomass responses to soil disturbances were examined across California LTSP sites.•Positive effects of compaction on tree biomass were through enhanced tree survival.•Organic matter removal did not significantly affect aboveground biomass.•Competing vegetation control was the single most important factor affecting biomass. We measured vegetation growth 5, 10, and 20years following plantation establishment at 12 Long-Term Soil Productivity installations in California’s Sierra Nevada and Southern Cascades. The combined effects of soil compaction (none, moderate, severe), organic matter removal (tree bole only, whole tree, whole tree plus forest floor), and competing vegetation control (complete: VC, none: NVC) on aboveground biomass were tested. Soils ranged from sandy loams to clay loams and were compacted (10–25% bulk density increase) prior to planting of mixed-conifer seedlings. Soil compaction resulted in a 15% increase in planted tree biomass on a plot-scale basis, attributed to improved seedling survival, along with reduced competing vegetation biomass on NVC plots. The unexpected response of tree growth to compaction was consistent across the LTSP sites. After year 5, there were no differences among the diverse organic matter treatments in tree biomass, periodic annual increment, or competing vegetation biomass. In contrast, vegetation control had a strong positive effect on tree biomass, about 68% greater tree growth (129.13Mgha−1) compared to trees grown on NVC plots (76.83Mgha−1). However, total vegetation biomass (trees+competing vegetation) was greater without vegetation control for the initial 10years of the study, prior to canopy closure. The results showed near-complete tolerance by forest biomass to soil compaction and surface organic matter manipulation on LTSP plantations across a wide geographic range in California. Vegetation control was the single most important factor affecting 20-year tree biomass.