High energy laser-shock induced phase transformation and micro-spallation on surface of stainless steels: The effect of stacking fault energy and deformation mechanisms

• Published in: Applied surface science Vol. 613; p. 156013
• Main Authors: Gong, Na, Luai Meng, Tzee, Kiang Ivan Tan, Chee, Cao, Jing, Wei, Yuefan, Maharjan, Niroj, Tan, Dennis C.C., Xie, Huiqing, Lee, Coryl J.J., Misra, R.D.K., Liu, Hongfei
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V 15.03.2023
• Subjects: Deformation twinning; Laser shock peening; Martensite transformation; Plastic deformation; Robotic hammer peening; Stacking fault energy; Stacking fault energy; Deformation twinning; Laser shock peening; Plastic deformation; Martensite transformation; Robotic hammer peening
• ISSN: 0169-4332; 1873-5584
• DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.156013

[Display omitted] •Laser-shock peening with varied pulses at single spots on SS304L and SS316L.•Carbon oxide depositions from black tapes occurred upon the laser process.•Backward pressure reflection leads to micro surface spallations/outward extrusions.•γ → ε induced by LSP but not RHP on SS304L rather than on SS316L.•Effect of stacking fault energy and deformation mechanism are discussed. Nanosecond laser-shock peening (LSP) was applied at single spots with up to 20 shots on stainless steels (SS304L and SS316L). Interestingly, it was found that the depth of the craters increased almost linearly with the number of LSP shots, and the rates were ∼ 6.6 and ∼ 10.8 μm/shot on SS304L and SS316L, respectively. Micro surface spallation surrounded by outward extrusions was observed at the crater center. Chemical and Raman analyses revealed a presence of carbon oxides and an absence of any LSP-induced metal oxidation at the crater center. However, LSP-induced γ-to-ε transformation occurred along with the presence of α'-martensite in the crater on SS304L rather than on SS316L, providing direct evidence for ε-mediated martensite transformation. The LSP-induced ε/α' ratio was significantly higher than that induced by robotic hammer peening (RHP) at similar depth. These differences are attributed to stacking fault energy and different plastic deformation mechanisms associated with LSP and RHP.