Shallow and deep learning of extreme rainfall events from convective atmospheres

• Published in: Natural hazards and earth system sciences Vol. 23; no. 9; pp. 3065 - 3077
• Main Authors: Bürger, Gerd, Heistermann, Maik
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Katlenburg-Lindau Copernicus GmbH 18.09.2023; Copernicus Publications
• Subjects: Algorithms; Atmosphere; Atmospheres; Atmospheric circulation; Classification; Deep learning; Extreme weather; Fields; Heavy rainfall; Machine learning; Optimization; Precipitation; Probability theory; Radar; Rain and rainfall; Rainfall; Regional climates; Simulation; Statistical analysis; Statistical methods; Trends; Germany
• ISSN: 1684-9981; 1561-8633; 1684-9981
• DOI: 10.5194/nhess-23-3065-2023

Our subject is a new catalogue of radar-based heavy rainfall events (CatRaRE) over Germany and how it relates to the concurrent atmospheric circulation. We classify daily ERA5 fields of convective indices according to CatRaRE, using an array of 13 statistical methods, consisting of 4 conventional (“shallow”) and 9 more recent deep machine learning (DL) algorithms; the classifiers are then applied to corresponding fields of simulated present and future atmospheres from the Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment (CORDEX) project. The inherent uncertainty of the DL results from the stochastic nature of their optimization is addressed by employing an ensemble approach using 20 runs for each network. The shallow random forest method performs best with an equitable threat score (ETS) around 0.52, followed by the DL networks ALL-CNN and ResNet with an ETS near 0.48. Their success can be understood as a result of conceptual simplicity and parametric parsimony, which obviously best fits the relatively simple classification task. It is found that, on summer days, CatRaRE-convective atmospheres over Germany occur with a probability of about 0.5. This probability is projected to increase, regardless of method, both in ERA5-reanalyzed and CORDEX-simulated atmospheres: for the historical period we find a centennial increase of about 0.2 and for the future period one of slightly below 0.1.