Should high‐dose N‐acetylcysteine be given in cases of massive paracetamol overdoses: A narrative review

N‐acetylcysteine (NAC) is regarded as an effective treatment of paracetamol overdoses. However, in cases of “massive” paracetamol overdoses, recent studies indicate that patients may not be sufficiently treated with the standard dose of NAC (300 mg/kg over 20–21 h). The subject is further complicate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBasic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology Vol. 135; no. 3; pp. 285 - 294
Main Authors Erichsen, Philip Ahle, Dalhoff, Kim, Andersen, Michael Asger
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.09.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:N‐acetylcysteine (NAC) is regarded as an effective treatment of paracetamol overdoses. However, in cases of “massive” paracetamol overdoses, recent studies indicate that patients may not be sufficiently treated with the standard dose of NAC (300 mg/kg over 20–21 h). The subject is further complicated because “massive overdoses” and “high‐risk” are defined differently; some studies use the ingested amount (e.g., >40 g), and some studies use blood concentrations of paracetamol and transaminases. This narrative review investigates whether high‐dose NAC significantly decreases the risk of hepatotoxicity in patients with massive paracetamol overdoses. Three observational studies were analysed; one study with 373 patients found no significant difference (odds ratio [OR]: 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49–3.29). One study with 79 patients found a significant difference (OR: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.08–0.94). The third study with 89 patients found a significant difference in hepatoxicity between the groups (p = 0.043). There are no solid evidence to support that treatment with high‐dose NAC significantly reduces the rate of hepatotoxicity in patients presenting with massive paracetamol overdoses. Differences in inclusion criteria in the included studies make the studies incomparable. This paper shows that standardized inclusion is needed to determine whether a high‐dose NAC regimen should be included in clinical practice.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1742-7835
1742-7843
1742-7843
DOI:10.1111/bcpt.14051