Putting the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in context: Comparative Recognition and Enforcement, by Dr Drossos Stamboulakis
In 'R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department', Lord Steyn offered the "famous aphorism" that "[i]n law context is everything". Duly noting this remark's own context - a prisoner's rights case, perhaps as far away from private international law (&q...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of private international law Vol. 19; no. 2; pp. 302 - 320 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article Book Review |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford
Routledge
04.05.2023
Taylor & Francis Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | In 'R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department', Lord Steyn offered the "famous aphorism" that "[i]n law context is everything". Duly noting this remark's own context - a prisoner's rights case, perhaps as far away from private international law ("PIL") as one might get - it is a particularly appropriate place to begin my review article addressing 'Comparative Recognition and Enforcement: Foreign Judgments and Awards' by Dr Drossos Stamboulakis. This is for two reasons. First, this excellent work assesses the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments itself - both its current state, and its potential future directions - in context. Secondly, this work is exceptionally timely, being published amidst a broader external PIL context reinforcing the importance of the PIL subject-matters it examines, and also being published alongside other contemporary PIL jurisdictional scholarship having a bearing upon the enforcement issues under examination here. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | JOURNAL OF PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW, Vol. 19, No. 2, Jul 2023, 302-320 Informit, Melbourne (Vic) content type line 1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Review-1 |
ISSN: | 1744-1048 1757-8418 |
DOI: | 10.1080/17441048.2023.2236872 |