Putting the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in context: Comparative Recognition and Enforcement, by Dr Drossos Stamboulakis

In 'R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department', Lord Steyn offered the "famous aphorism" that "[i]n law context is everything". Duly noting this remark's own context - a prisoner's rights case, perhaps as far away from private international law (&q...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of private international law Vol. 19; no. 2; pp. 302 - 320
Main Author Hayward, Benjamin
Format Journal Article Book Review
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Routledge 04.05.2023
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In 'R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department', Lord Steyn offered the "famous aphorism" that "[i]n law context is everything". Duly noting this remark's own context - a prisoner's rights case, perhaps as far away from private international law ("PIL") as one might get - it is a particularly appropriate place to begin my review article addressing 'Comparative Recognition and Enforcement: Foreign Judgments and Awards' by Dr Drossos Stamboulakis. This is for two reasons. First, this excellent work assesses the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments itself - both its current state, and its potential future directions - in context. Secondly, this work is exceptionally timely, being published amidst a broader external PIL context reinforcing the importance of the PIL subject-matters it examines, and also being published alongside other contemporary PIL jurisdictional scholarship having a bearing upon the enforcement issues under examination here.
Bibliography:JOURNAL OF PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW, Vol. 19, No. 2, Jul 2023, 302-320
Informit, Melbourne (Vic)
content type line 1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:1744-1048
1757-8418
DOI:10.1080/17441048.2023.2236872