How Cutbacks and Job Satisfaction Are Related: The Role of Top-Level Public Managers’ Autonomy

Many studies on cutback management have suggested that cutbacks may have negative consequences for employee well-being in the public sector. However, the relationship between cutbacks and the work-related attitudes of top-level managers has received little attention. In this study, we assess the rel...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inReview of public personnel administration Vol. 38; no. 1; pp. 5 - 23
Main Authors van der Voet, Joris, Van de Walle, Steven
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.03.2018
SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
Subjects
Autonomy
Implementation
Job satisfaction
Politicians
Politics
Public sector
Regression analysis
Satisfaction
Wages & salaries
autonomy
financial crisis
job satisfaction
cutback management
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Many studies on cutback management have suggested that cutbacks may have negative consequences for employee well-being in the public sector. However, the relationship between cutbacks and the work-related attitudes of top-level managers has received little attention. In this study, we assess the relationships between five commonly used cutback measures and the job satisfaction of top-level public managers in 12 European countries. We propose and test a model in which autonomy serves as an explanatory variable for the relationship between cutbacks and job satisfaction. The results indicate that cutback measures have little direct effect on the job satisfaction of managers. However, as cutback measures are related negatively to the perceived managerial autonomy of public managers and positively to the degree in which politicians interfere in the affairs of managers, autonomy may function as a mechanism to explain decreased job satisfaction as a result of cutback implementation.
ISSN:0734-371X
1552-759X
DOI:10.1177/0734371X15609409