Randomized phase 2 trial of tremelimumab and durvalumab in combination versus sequentially in recurrent platinum‐resistant ovarian cancer

There was no difference in the median progression‐free survival for combination tremelimumab plus durvalumab compared to tremelimumab alone (administered as part of a sequential treatment strategy) in a heavily pretreated population of patients with platinum‐resistant high‐grade serous ovarian cance...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCancer Vol. 130; no. 7; pp. 1061 - 1071
Main Authors Hinchcliff, Emily M., Knisely, Anne, Adjei, Naomi, Fellman, Bryan, Yuan, Ying, Patel, Ami, Xu, Cai, Westin, Shannon N., Sood, Anil K., Soliman, Pamela T., Shafer, Aaron, Fleming, Nicole D., Gershenson, David M., Vikram, Raghunandan, Bathala, Tharakeswara, Vining, David, Ganeshan, Dhakshina M., Lu, Karen H., Sun, Charlotte C., Meyer, Larissa A., Jazaeri, Amir A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.04.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:There was no difference in the median progression‐free survival for combination tremelimumab plus durvalumab compared to tremelimumab alone (administered as part of a sequential treatment strategy) in a heavily pretreated population of patients with platinum‐resistant high‐grade serous ovarian cancer. The adverse event profile was consistent with that previously reported for immune checkpoint blockade, and patient‐reported outcomes were similar in both arms.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Undefined-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-3
ISSN:0008-543X
1097-0142
1097-0142
DOI:10.1002/cncr.35126