A Graph-Based Approach for Making Consensus-Based Decisions in Image Search and Person Re-Identification
Image matching and retrieval is the underlying problem in various directions of computer vision research, such as image search, biometrics, and person re-identification. The problem involves searching for the closest match to a query image in a database of images. This work presents a method for gen...
Saved in:
Published in | IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence Vol. 43; no. 3; pp. 753 - 765 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
IEEE
01.03.2021
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Image matching and retrieval is the underlying problem in various directions of computer vision research, such as image search, biometrics, and person re-identification. The problem involves searching for the closest match to a query image in a database of images. This work presents a method for generating a consensus amongst multiple algorithms for image matching and retrieval. The proposed algorithm, Shortest Hamiltonian Path Estimation (SHaPE), maps the process of ranking candidates based on a set of scores to a graph-theoretic problem. This mapping is extended to incorporate results from multiple sets of scores obtained from different matching algorithms. The problem of consensus-based decision-making is solved by searching for a suitable path in the graph under specified constraints using a two-step process. First, a greedy algorithm is employed to generate an approximate solution. In the second step, the graph is extended and the problem is solved by applying Ant Colony Optimization. Experiments are performed for image search and person re-identification to illustrate the efficiency of SHaPE in image matching and retrieval. Although SHaPE is presented in the context of image retrieval, it can be applied, in general, to any problem involving the ranking of candidates based on multiple sets of scores. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0162-8828 1939-3539 2160-9292 |
DOI: | 10.1109/TPAMI.2019.2944597 |