The elite delusion: reflexivity, identity and positionality in qualitative research

This article examines how perceptions of interviewing elites influence the decisions made at every stage of the qualitative research process. It also reflects on issues of positionality and power which relate not only to the relationship between researcher and respondent but also to the subject matt...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inQualitative research : QR Vol. 19; no. 3; pp. 263 - 276
Main Author Mason-Bish, Hannah
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London, England SAGE Publications 01.06.2019
Sage Publications Ltd
Subjects
Decision making
Elites
Identity
Interviews
Positionality
Qualitative research
Reflexivity
Researcher subject relations
Researchers
qualitative research
reflexivity
elite interviewing
identity
roles
positionality
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:This article examines how perceptions of interviewing elites influence the decisions made at every stage of the qualitative research process. It also reflects on issues of positionality and power which relate not only to the relationship between researcher and respondent but also to the subject matter of the research itself. As such I suggest that it is important to critically assess assumptions made about elites and to reflect on how the position of the researcher might impact upon the exchange and resultant findings. In essence what is found is that in discussing the construction of policy, a delicate balance is struck between positionality and research topic and that the policy narrative is a joint construction which is very much shaped by the identity and positionality of everyone involved.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1468-7941
1741-3109
DOI:10.1177/1468794118770078