Effects of orthotic therapeutic electrical stimulation in the treatment of patients with paresis associated with acute cervical spinal cord injury: a randomized control trial

• Published in: Spinal cord Vol. 55; no. 12; pp. 1066 - 1070
• Main Authors: Iwahashi, K, Hayashi, T, Watanabe, R, Nishimura, A, Ueta, T, Maeda, T, Shiba, K
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Nature Publishing Group 01.12.2017
• Subjects: Classification; Data processing; Edema; Electrical stimuli; Fingers; Injuries; International standards; Motors; Paresis; Patients; Randomization; Spinal cord injuries; Stimulation; Training
• ISSN: 1362-4393; 1476-5624
• DOI: 10.1038/sc.2017.74

A randomized controlled trial. To determine the effects of orthotic therapeutic electrical stimulation (TES) on the hand in patients with paresis associated with acute cervical spinal cord injury. Spinal Injuries Center, Fukuoka, Japan. The study included patients treated for spinal cord injuries (Frankel classification, grades B and C) at our institution within 1 week post injury between May 2011 and December 2014. The patients were allocated randomly to TES and control groups at the time of admission and underwent TES+conventional training or conventional training alone, respectively. Both hands of each patient were treated in the same way. The primary outcome was total passive motion (TPM) of the fingers (degrees). The secondary outcomes were edema (cm) and the upper-extremity motor scores of the International Standards for the Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI). After randomization, outcomes were assessed at 1 week, 1 month and 3 months post injury in both groups. Twenty-nine individuals were assessed at 3 months (15, TES; 14, control). There were no significant between-group differences for TPM of the fingers, edema and upper-extremity motor scores at 1 week, 1 month and 3 months after injury, although TPM of the fingers tended to be lower in the control group. It is unclear from the results of this study whether TES has a therapeutic effect on TPM, edema or the upper-extremity motor score of the ISNCSCI. The results of this study provide useful data for future meta-analyses.