Hemorrhoidectomy: Open or Closed Technique?: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial
PURPOSE: METHODS: RESULTS:Mean operating time was significantly shorter in Group A (35 ± 7 vs. 45 ± 8 minutes, P < 0.001). Analgesic requirement on the day of surgery and the first postoperative day was also significantly lower (P < 0.05). The morbidity rate was higher in Group B (P < 0.05)...
Saved in:
Published in | Diseases of the colon & rectum Vol. 45; no. 1; pp. 70 - 75 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Secaucus, NJ
The ASCRS
01.01.2002
Springer Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | PURPOSE:
METHODS:
RESULTS:Mean operating time was significantly shorter in Group A (35 ± 7 vs. 45 ± 8 minutes, P < 0.001). Analgesic requirement on the day of surgery and the first postoperative day was also significantly lower (P < 0.05). The morbidity rate was higher in Group B (P < 0.05). Length of hospital stay and duration of inability to work were similar in both groups (P > 0.05). Healing time was significantly shorter in Group B (2.8 ± 0.6 vs. 3.5 ± 0.5 weeks, P < 0.001). Median follow-up time was 19.5 (range, 4-40) months. The only late complication (anal stenosis) was observed in one patient in Group B.
CONCLUSIONS: |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 ObjectType-News-3 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0012-3706 1530-0358 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10350-004-6116-1 |