Linking resource‐ and disturbance‐based models to explain tree–grass coexistence in savannas

Summary Savannas cover a significant fraction of the Earth's land surface. In these ecosystems, C3 trees and C4 grasses coexist persistently, but the mechanisms explaining coexistence remain subject to debate. Different quantitative models have been proposed to explain coexistence, but these mo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe New phytologist Vol. 237; no. 6; pp. 1966 - 1979
Main Authors Holdo, Ricardo M., Nippert, Jesse B.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.03.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Summary Savannas cover a significant fraction of the Earth's land surface. In these ecosystems, C3 trees and C4 grasses coexist persistently, but the mechanisms explaining coexistence remain subject to debate. Different quantitative models have been proposed to explain coexistence, but these models make widely contrasting assumptions about which mechanisms are responsible for savanna persistence. Here, we show that no single existing model fully captures all key elements required to explain tree–grass coexistence across savanna rainfall gradients, but many models make important contributions. We show that recent empirical work allows us to combine many existing elements with new ideas to arrive at a synthesis that combines elements of two dominant frameworks: Walter's two‐layer model and demographic bottlenecks. We propose that functional rooting separation is necessary for coexistence and is the crux of the coexistence problem. It is both well‐supported empirically and necessary for tree persistence, given the comprehensive grass superiority for soil moisture acquisition. We argue that eventual tree dominance through shading is precluded by ecohydrological constraints in dry savannas and by fire and herbivores in wet savannas. Strong asymmetric grass–tree competition for soil moisture limits tree growth, exposing trees to persistent demographic bottlenecks.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0028-646X
1469-8137
1469-8137
DOI:10.1111/nph.18648