THE HOLY & WHOLLY OTHER: KIERKEGAARD ON THE ALTERITY OF GOD

In response to prevailing perceptions, I contend that Søren Kierkegaard (1813–55) conceives of the wholly otherness of God via his dialectical category of the ‘infinite qualitative difference’ between the human and the divine, initially through the self's consciousness of sin and ultimately thr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHeythrop journal Vol. 53; no. 1; pp. 9 - 23
Main Author PODMORE, SIMON D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.01.2012
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In response to prevailing perceptions, I contend that Søren Kierkegaard (1813–55) conceives of the wholly otherness of God via his dialectical category of the ‘infinite qualitative difference’ between the human and the divine, initially through the self's consciousness of sin and ultimately through the self's acceptance of the gift of forgiveness. Therefore, I claim that while the common designation of Kierkegaard's God as ‘Wholly Other’ may initially evoke the alterity of sin; it is not ultimately sufficient to describe the divine alterity which Kierkegaard regards as more faithfully manifest in the ‘impossible possibility’ of forgiveness. Through this reading, I finally suggest that the ‘Wholly Other’ is not ultimately representative of God in Kierkegaard's writings and might be more faithfully supplemented by the appellation of the Holy Other.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-PRRD4DD7-S
ArticleID:HEYJ628
istex:73702D6DB5284006926C09A105DDEA2DB7EAD49F
ISSN:0018-1196
1468-2265
DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2265.2010.00628.x