Separable Games

Certain 2‐person oscilloscope‐based continuous games are known to give rise to dynamic behavior resembling that of the Prisoner's Dilemma game and other 2‐choice games. We explain this similarity of behavior in terms of structural equivalence between the 2‐person continuous games and a subset o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBehavioral Science Vol. 14; no. 2; pp. 121 - 132
Main Author Hamburger, Henry
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published California John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01.03.1969
University of Michigan, Mental Health Research Institute
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Certain 2‐person oscilloscope‐based continuous games are known to give rise to dynamic behavior resembling that of the Prisoner's Dilemma game and other 2‐choice games. We explain this similarity of behavior in terms of structural equivalence between the 2‐person continuous games and a subset of all possible 2‐person, 2‐choice (2 × 2) games, called the separable games. A game is defined as separable if each player's payoff can be expressed as a sum of partial payoffs, each of which depends only on the strategy choice of one player. All separable games can be described in terms of the same two psychologically relevant parameters. They can be played in staggered, graduated, or continuous form. Non‐separable games, including “Chicken” and many other interesting games, cannot be staggered, and their graduated and continuous versions are subject to a reinterpretation.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-CB16S7L3-6
The author wishes to thank Dr. Melvin Guyer for pointing out most of the relevant empirical literature, Professor Anatol Rapoport for counsel and inspiration, and Professor Seymour Rosenberg and other members of the Workshop on Mathematical Social Psychology (under the aegis of the Mathematical Social Sciences Board of the National Science Foundation) conducted in July, 1967, for helpful discussion.
istex:856333D778C3AAB8CB53E989814F6F20B2C9172C
ArticleID:BS3830140205
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ISSN:0005-7940
1099-1743
1932-300X
DOI:10.1002/bs.3830140205