Fruit growing direction recognition and nesting grasping strategies for tomato harvesting robots

In recent years, the potential of robotic harvesting in greenhouse tomato production has garnered significant attention within the tomato industry. However, there is a lack of sufficient research on the complete replacement of manual harvesting with this technology. In this paper, we propose a tomat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of field robotics Vol. 41; no. 2; pp. 300 - 313
Main Authors Zheng, Xiajun, Rong, Jiacheng, Zhang, Zhiqin, Yang, Yan, Li, Wei, Yuan, Ting
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.03.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In recent years, the potential of robotic harvesting in greenhouse tomato production has garnered significant attention within the tomato industry. However, there is a lack of sufficient research on the complete replacement of manual harvesting with this technology. In this paper, we propose a tomato harvesting method that utilizes a nesting approach to simplify the process and minimize damage. The paper describes the tomato harvesting robot prototype, the visual system equipped with three vision‐based tomato detectors: YOLOv5_CBAM, which incorporates a convolutional block attention module; YOLOv5_SE, enhanced with a squeeze‐and‐excitation block; and a standard YOLOv5s model. Additionally, a novel shear gripping method for fruit bunches is presented, utilizing a bottom‐up snapping technique during harvesting. Point cloud data are utilized to determine the position of the tomato's main stem and bunch. The paper includes field tests and experimental findings, which indicate that the YOLOv5_CBAM model achieves the highest precision (82.62%) and recall (82.57%), outperforming YOLOv5_SE and standard YOLOv5s. Field experiments demonstrate that the improved end‐effector and vision system have significantly enhanced the robot's performance, achieving a 57.5% harvesting success rate in just 14.9 s.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1556-4959
1556-4967
DOI:10.1002/rob.22263