Mean nocturnal baseline impedance in gastro-esophageal reflux disease diagnosis: Should we strictly follow the Lyon 2 Consensus?

Clinical practice guidelines drive clinical practice and clinicians rely to them when trying to answer their most common questions. One of the most important position papers in the field of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the one produced by the Lyon Consensus. Recently an updated second...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWorld journal of gastroenterology : WJG Vol. 30; no. 26; pp. 3253 - 3256
Main Authors Voulgaris, Theodoros A, Karamanolis, Georgios P
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 14.07.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Clinical practice guidelines drive clinical practice and clinicians rely to them when trying to answer their most common questions. One of the most important position papers in the field of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the one produced by the Lyon Consensus. Recently an updated second version has been released. Mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) was proposed by the first Consensus to act as supportive evidence for GERD diagnosis. Originally a cut-off of 2292 Ohms was proposed, a value revised in the second edition. The updated Consensus recommended that an MNBI < 1500 Ohms strongly suggests GERD while a value > 2500 Ohms can be used to refute GERD. The proposed cut-offs move in the correct direction by diminishing the original cut-off, nevertheless they arise from a study of normal subjects where cut-offs were provided by measuring the mean value ± 2SD and not in symptomatic patients. However, data exist that even symptomatic patients with inconclusive disease or reflux hypersensitivity (RH) show lower MNBI values in comparison to normal subjects or patients with functional heartburn (FH). Moreover, according to the data, MNBI, even among symptomatic patients, is affected by age and body mass index. Also, various studies have proposed different cut-offs by using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis even lower than the one proposed. Finally, no information is given for patients submitted to on-proton pump inhibitors pH-impedance studies even if new and extremely important data now exist. Therefore, even if MNBI is an extremely important tool when trying to approach patients with reflux symptoms and could distinguish conclusive GERD from RH or FH, its values should be interpreted with caution.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
Corresponding author: Theodoros A Voulgaris, MD, PhD, Researcher, Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Agiou Thoma 17, Athens 11527, Greece. thvoulgaris87@gmail.com
Co-first authors: Theodoros A Voulgaris and Georgios P Karamanolis.
Author contributions: Voulgaris TA and Karamanolis GP contributed equally to manuscript preparation. Voulgaris TA and Karamanolis GP contributed equally to this work as co-first authors.
ISSN:1007-9327
2219-2840
2219-2840
DOI:10.3748/wjg.v30.i26.3253