Real-world Outcomes of PCIT for Children at Risk of Autism or Developmental Delay

Objectives Disruptive behaviors in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) or developmental delay are common, persistent and cause distress to families. Parent–Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) may be an effective intervention with emerging evidence to support its use for children with at-risk d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of child and family studies Vol. 29; no. 6; pp. 1701 - 1711
Main Authors McInnis, Peter, Kohlhoff, Jane, Eapen, Valsamma
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer US 01.06.2020
Springer
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1062-1024
1573-2843
DOI10.1007/s10826-020-01699-0

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objectives Disruptive behaviors in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) or developmental delay are common, persistent and cause distress to families. Parent–Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) may be an effective intervention with emerging evidence to support its use for children with at-risk development. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of standard PCIT for young children (2–4 years) with disruptive behaviors and signs of ASD and/or developmental delay, treated in a real-world clinical setting. We hypothesized that there would be a reduction in disruptive behaviors and for parents, a reduction in depressive symptoms. Methods This was a retrospective file-review study of 236 referrals to a toddler clinic over a 17-month period (January 2016 to May 2017). Disruptive child behavior (EBCI Intensity scale and ECBI Problem scale) and maternal depression (EDS score) severity were analyzed across two time conditions (pre-treatment and post-treatment) using linear mixed models with repeated measures, including time, child ASD risk status and their interaction as main effects. An identical linear mixed models with repeated measures analysis was subsequently conducted using clinician identified concern about the child’s development as the between subjects factor. Results Disruptive child behavior for children at-risk of autism (high SCQ score) and for those with low SCQ scores, improved on average into the non-clinical range. Parental EDS scores reduced in the both groups, but reduced by a greater degree in the children at-risk of autism (high SCQ) group. Conclusions This study suggests that children at-risk of autism and developmental delay should not be excluded from PCIT, an evidence-based intervention for disruptive behaviors, as there is potential benefit for both children and parents. Highlights Standard PCIT reduced disruptive behavior for children at-risk of autism or developmental delay. Parental EDS scores reduced overall, by a greater degree for parents with a child at-risk of autism. PCIT may be effective for children at-risk of autism or developmental delay, and for their parents’ depressive symptoms.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1062-1024
1573-2843
DOI:10.1007/s10826-020-01699-0