Optimal On-Machine Measurement of Position-Independent Geometric Errors for Rotary Axes in Five-Axis Machines with a Universal Head

This study proposes an optimal on-machine measurement method to measure position-independent geometric errors of five-axis machines, including machine tools and coordinate measuring machines, with a universal head. This measurement requires only a calibrated three-dimensional (3-D) probe and a preci...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of precision engineering and manufacturing Vol. 19; no. 4; pp. 545 - 551
Main Authors Lee, Kwang-Il, Lee, Jae-Chang, Yang, Seung-Han
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Seoul Korean Society for Precision Engineering 01.04.2018
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study proposes an optimal on-machine measurement method to measure position-independent geometric errors of five-axis machines, including machine tools and coordinate measuring machines, with a universal head. This measurement requires only a calibrated three-dimensional (3-D) probe and a precision sphere, which are fundamental components of on-machine measurement systems in general, to minimize measurement costs, including operator effort and operating time. Eight position-independent geometric errors are used to describe the coordinate systems of the two rotary axes through a kinematic analysis. The center of the precision sphere, which is stationary during the measurement, is measured at various angles of the rotary axes. Then, the linearized relationship between the measured positions of the precision sphere and the geometric errors is derived using an error synthesis model under rigid-body and small-value assumptions. The proposed method is tested through a simulation for validation. The geometric errors of a five-axis coordinate measuring machine with a universal head are measured with measurement uncertainty by applying the proposed method. Then, the measurement results are confirmed by comparing the measured positions of the precision sphere and calculated positions using the measured geometric errors at the other (i.e., the arbitrary, or not measured) angles of rotary axes.
ISSN:2234-7593
2005-4602
DOI:10.1007/s12541-018-0066-3