Hormone replacement therapy after treatment for breast cancer: physicians' attitudes towards randomized trials
Physician support is required for successful patient recruitment to a large randomized controlled trial (RCT) designed to determine the safety and benefits of short-term hormone replacement therapy (HRT) after breast cancer (BC). A survey was mailed to 1899 Canadian gynaecologists, family physicians...
Saved in:
Published in | Breast cancer research and treatment Vol. 79; no. 2; pp. 213 - 223 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Dordrecht
Springer
01.05.2003
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Physician support is required for successful patient recruitment to a large randomized controlled trial (RCT) designed to determine the safety and benefits of short-term hormone replacement therapy (HRT) after breast cancer (BC).
A survey was mailed to 1899 Canadian gynaecologists, family physicians, medical, radiation and surgical oncologists to assess willingness to refer patients to an RCT of HRT after BC.
Of 538 physicians, 420 (78%) reported that they would be willing to refer a woman after BC to an RCT of HRT versus placebo. Variables predicting willingness to refer included: support for HRT in well women (p = 0.04) and after BC (p = 0.0001); support for clinical trials (p = 0.0001); ongoing BC trials at the physicians' institution (p = 0.003); currently prescribing HRT to women after BC (p = 0.03); and beneficial results in ongoing RCTs of HRT in well women (p = 0.02).
An RCT of short-term HRT after BC may be feasible among Canadian physicians. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0167-6806 1573-7217 |
DOI: | 10.1023/A:1023951616696 |