"Good Girls": Gender, Social Class, and Slut Discourse on Campus

Women's participation in slut shaming is often viewed as internalized oppression: they apply disadvantageous sexual double standards established by men. This perspective grants women little agency and neglects their simultaneous location in other social structures. In this article we synthesize...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSocial psychology quarterly Vol. 77; no. 2; pp. 100 - 122
Main Authors Armstrong, Elizabeth A., Hamilton, Laura T., Armstrong, Elizabeth M., Seeley, J. Lotus
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.06.2014
American Sociological Association
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Women's participation in slut shaming is often viewed as internalized oppression: they apply disadvantageous sexual double standards established by men. This perspective grants women little agency and neglects their simultaneous location in other social structures. In this article we synthesize insights from social psychology, gender, and culture to argue that undergraduate women use slut stigma to draw boundaries around status groups linked to social class—while also regulating sexual behavior and gender performance. High-status women employ slut discourse to assert class advantage, defining themselves as classy rather than trashy, while low-status women express class resentment—deriding rich, bitchy sluts for their exclusivity. Slut discourse enables, rather than constrains, sexual experimentation for the high-status women whose definitions prevail in the dominant social scene. This is a form of sexual privilege. In contrast, low-status women risk public shaming when they attempt to enter dominant social worlds.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0190-2725
1939-8999
DOI:10.1177/0190272514521220