How Long-lived Grains Dominate the Shape of the Zodiacal Cloud

• Published in: The planetary science journal Vol. 5; no. 3; pp. 82 - 106
• Main Authors: Pokorný, Petr, Moorhead, Althea V., Kuchner, Marc J., Szalay, Jamey R., Malaspina, David M.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: The American Astronomical Society 01.03.2024; IOP Publishing
• Subjects: Comets; Dynamical evolution; Exozodiacal dust; Impact phenomena; Interplanetary dust; Meteoroid dust clouds; Meteoroids; Micrometeoroids; Short period comets; Zodiacal cloud
• ISSN: 2632-3338; 2632-3338
• DOI: 10.3847/PSJ/ad2de8

Grain–grain collisions shape the three-dimensional size and velocity distribution of the inner Zodiacal Cloud and the impact rates of dust on inner planets, yet they remain the least understood sink of zodiacal dust grains. For the first time, we combine the collisional grooming method combined with a dynamical meteoroid model of Jupiter-family comets (JFCs) that covers 4 orders of magnitude in particle diameter to investigate the consequences of grain–grain collisions in the inner Zodiacal Cloud. We compare this model to a suite of observational constraints from meteor radars, the Infrared Astronomical Satellite, mass fluxes at Earth, and inner solar probes, and use it to derive the population and collisional strength parameters for the JFC dust cloud. We derive a critical specific energy of Q D * = 5 × 10 5 ± 4 × 10 5 R met − 0.24 J kg −1 for particles from JFC particles, making them 2–3 orders of magnitude more resistant to collisions than previously assumed. We find that the differential power-law size index −4.2 ± 0.1 for particles generated by JFCs provides a good match to observed data. Our model provides a good match to the mass-production rates derived from the Parker Solar Probe observations and their scaling with the heliocentric distance. The higher resistance to collisions of dust particles might have strong implications to models of collisions in solar and exosolar dust clouds. The migration via Poynting–Robertson drag might be more important for denser clouds, the mass-production rates of astrophysical debris disks might be overestimated, and the mass of the source populations might be underestimated. Our models and code are freely available online.