Synthesis of polyketone-g-sodium styrene sulfonate cation exchange membrane via irradiation and its desalination properties

Using the radiation grafting technique, polyketone membranes were graft copolymerized with sodium styrene sulfonate (SSS) in the presence of additives such as Mohr’s salt and H 2 SO 4 . Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy was used to characterize the grafted membranes. Water uptake (WU),...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMacromolecular research Vol. 25; no. 11; pp. 1063 - 1069
Main Authors Kim, In Sik, Hwang, Chi Won, Kim, Young Joong, Canlier, Ali, Jeong, Kyung Seok, Hwang, Taek Sung
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Seoul The Polymer Society of Korea 01.11.2017
Springer Nature B.V
한국고분자학회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Using the radiation grafting technique, polyketone membranes were graft copolymerized with sodium styrene sulfonate (SSS) in the presence of additives such as Mohr’s salt and H 2 SO 4 . Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy was used to characterize the grafted membranes. Water uptake (WU), ion exchange capacity (IEC) and electrical resistance (ER) of the prepared membranes were measured in order to evaluate their physical properties The prepared membranes were applied to the membrane capacitive deionization (MCDI) process, in which their salt removal rates were evaluated and compared to those of CDI (capacitive deionization) process. The degree of grafting rose from 14.4% to 81.4% as the irradiation dose and the monomer concentration were increased. The water uptake ranged from 7.9% to 34.2%. The ionexchange capacity was observed between 0.43 meq/g and 1.1 meq/g, and the electrical resistance had values ranging from 12.2 Ω·cm 2 to 2.1 Ω·cm 2 . The electrical resistance decreased as the ion-exchange capacity was extended. When the prepared cation exchange membrane was used in the MCDI process, the salt removal rate reached 87.6%, which was much higher than 28.8% of CDI process.
ISSN:1598-5032
2092-7673
DOI:10.1007/s13233-017-5145-2