Usefulness of preoperative computed tomography findings for airway management in patients with acute odontogenic infection: a retrospective study

• Published in: Odontology Vol. 111; no. 2; pp. 499 - 510
• Main Authors: Nagaura, Madoka, Saitoh, Keisuke, Tsujimoto, Gentaro, Yasuda, Asako, Shionoya, Yoshiki, Sunada, Katsuhisa, Kawai, Taisuke
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Singapore Springer Nature Singapore 01.04.2023; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Airway management; Airway Management - methods; Computed tomography; Dentistry; Edema; Humans; Infections; Inflammation; Intubation; Intubation, Intratracheal - methods; Laryngoscopy; Larynx; Mandible; Medical personnel; Medicine; Molars; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery; Original Article; Patients; Pharynx; Respiratory tract; Retrospective Studies; Teeth; Tomography; Difficulty of intubation; Intubation method; Odontogenic infection; Computed tomography; Parapharyngeal space
• ISSN: 1618-1247; 1618-1255
• DOI: 10.1007/s10266-022-00756-y

Odontogenic infection is more likely to affect the airway and interfere with intubation than non-odontogenic causes. Although anesthesiologists predict the difficulty of intubation and determine the method, they may encounter unexpected cases of difficult intubation. An inappropriate intubation can cause airway obstruction due to bleeding and edema by damaging the pharynx and larynx. This study was performed to determine the most important imaging findings indicating preoperative selection of an appropriate intubation method. This retrospective study included 113 patients who underwent anti-inflammatory treatment for odontogenic infection. The patients were divided into two groups according to the intubation method: a Macintosh laryngoscope (45 patients) and others (video laryngoscope and fiberscope) (68 patients). The extent of inflammation in each causative tooth, the severity of inflammation (S1–4), and their influence on the airway were evaluated by computed tomography. The causative teeth were mandibular molars in more than 90%. As the severity of inflammation increased, anesthesiologists tended to choose intubation methods other than Macintosh laryngoscopy. In the most severe cases (S4), anesthesiologists significantly preferred other intubation methods (33 cases) over Macintosh laryngoscopy (9 cases). All patients with S4 showed inflammation in the parapharyngeal space, and the airway was affected in 41 patients. The mandibular molars were the causative teeth most likely to affect the airway and surrounding region. In addition to clinical findings, the presence or absence of inflammation that has spread to the parapharyngeal space on preoperative computed tomography was considered an important indicator of the difficulty of intubation.