Empirical viscous coefficients of dilute solutions of tetraethylene glycol dimethyl ether in 2-propanol and in 2-butanol at different temperatures

This paper reports experimental viscosities and densities of binary mixtures containing tetraethylene glycol dimethyl ether+(2-propanol, 2-butanol) at four different temperatures (288.15, 298.15, 308.15 and 318.15 K), over the mole fraction ( x) range of tetraethylene glycol dimethyl ether between 0...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of molecular liquids Vol. 115; no. 2; pp. 69 - 74
Main Authors Aznarez, S., Amid, A., de Ruiz Holgado, M.M.E.F., Arancibia, E.L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 15.11.2004
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This paper reports experimental viscosities and densities of binary mixtures containing tetraethylene glycol dimethyl ether+(2-propanol, 2-butanol) at four different temperatures (288.15, 298.15, 308.15 and 318.15 K), over the mole fraction ( x) range of tetraethylene glycol dimethyl ether between 0≤ x≤0.1 and at atmospheric pressure. The empirical coefficients ( β G, γ G and Δ G 1,2* 0) were determined from the viscosity values of the binary mixtures in the dilute zone of tetraethylene glycol dimethyl ether, using the Tamamushi–Isono empirical relationship between the thermodynamic function, Δ G 1,2* 0, with the mole fraction of tetraethylene glycol dimethyl ether ( x) at a particular temperature. The Jones–Dole coefficient ( B) was calculated in a graphical way. Both contributions, the energetic and the volumetric ones, to coefficient ( B) were obtained. A comparative study of the Jones–Dole coefficient B and the coefficient β G of the solutions of tetraethylene glycol dimethyl ether in 2-alkanol with tetraethylene glycol dimethyl ether in 1-alkanol data, obtained from literature, was carried out. The results are discussed qualitatively using the rate process Eyring theory, applied to viscous flow.
ISSN:0167-7322
1873-3166
DOI:10.1016/j.molliq.2004.04.002