Baricitinib for atopic dermatitis patients who responded inadequately to dupilumab treatment: First daily practice results
Background Baricitinib is the first JAK inhibitor registered for the treatment of moderate‐to‐severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Efficacy and safety were shown in clinical trials, but daily practice data is sparse. Objectives To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of baricitinib treatment in daily pra...
Saved in:
Published in | JEADV clinical practice Vol. 1; no. 4; pp. 364 - 371 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Madrid
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
01.12.2022
Wiley |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background
Baricitinib is the first JAK inhibitor registered for the treatment of moderate‐to‐severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Efficacy and safety were shown in clinical trials, but daily practice data is sparse.
Objectives
To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of baricitinib treatment in daily practice in AD patients who have inadequately responded to dupilumab.
Methods
In this prospective observational cohort study, AD patients who failed dupilumab treatment and started baricitinib treatment in context of standard care at the Erasmus MC (the Netherlands) were included. We analysed physician‐reported scores and patient‐reported outcome measure scores (PROMs).
Results
Twenty‐five patients were included. Baricitinib treatment resulted in significant improvement of Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores and PROMs. Seven patients showed a good and sustained response (EASI50), eight patients showed no response (<EASI50), and five patients showed an initial response but worsening of EASI scores in time. Overall, baricitinib was well tolerated. Four patients discontinued baricitinib treatment due to ineffectiveness or side effects.
Conclusions
Baricitinib can be an effective treatment for a subset of AD patients who failed dupilumab treatment in daily practice. We found three different treatment response groups including responders, temporarily responders, and non‐responders. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Linde de Wijs, Corine Schreurs, and Anne Schlösser contributed equally. Correction added on 5 November 2022, after first online publication: Acknowledgements has been changed to Ethics Statement. |
ISSN: | 2768-6566 2768-6566 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jvc2.64 |