A Phase Variable Approach for IMU-Based Locomotion Activity Recognition
Objective: This paper describes a gait classification method that utilizes measured motion of the thigh segment provided by an inertial measurement unit. Methods: The classification method employs a phase-variable description of gait, and identifies a given activity based on the expected curvature c...
Saved in:
Published in | IEEE transactions on biomedical engineering Vol. 65; no. 6; pp. 1330 - 1338 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
IEEE
01.06.2018
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Objective: This paper describes a gait classification method that utilizes measured motion of the thigh segment provided by an inertial measurement unit. Methods: The classification method employs a phase-variable description of gait, and identifies a given activity based on the expected curvature characteristics of that activity over a gait cycle. The classification method was tested in experiments conducted with seven healthy subjects performing three different locomotor activities: level ground walking, stair descent, and stair ascent. Classification accuracy of the phase variable classification method was assessed for classifying each activity, and transitions between activities, and compared to a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) classifier as a benchmark. Results: For the subjects tested, the phase variable classification method outperformed LDA when using nonsubject-specific training data, while the LDA outperformed the phase variable approach when using subject-specific training. Conclusions: The proposed method may provide improved classification accuracy for gait classification applications trained with nonsubject-specific data. Significance: This paper offers a new method of gait classification based on a phase variable description. The method is shown to provide improved classification accuracy relative to an LDA pattern recognition framework when trained with nonsubject-specific data. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0018-9294 1558-2531 1558-2531 |
DOI: | 10.1109/TBME.2017.2750139 |