Tactile Sensation Assisted Motor Imagery Training for Enhanced BCI Performance: A Randomized Controlled Study

Objective: Independent of conventional neurofeedback training, in this study, we propose a tactile sensation assisted motor imagery training (SA-MI Training) approach to improve the performance of MI-based BCI. Methods: Twenty-six subjects were recruited and randomly divided into a Training-Group an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE transactions on biomedical engineering Vol. 70; no. 2; pp. 694 - 702
Main Authors Zhong, Yucun, Yao, Lin, Wang, Ji, Wang, Yueming
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States IEEE 01.02.2023
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective: Independent of conventional neurofeedback training, in this study, we propose a tactile sensation assisted motor imagery training (SA-MI Training) approach to improve the performance of MI-based BCI. Methods: Twenty-six subjects were recruited and randomly divided into a Training-Group and a Control-Group. All subjects were required to perform three blocks of MI tasks. In the Training-Group, during the second block (SA-MI Training block), tactile stimulation was applied to the left or right wrist while the subjects were performing the left or right-hand MI task, while during the first block (Pre-Training block) and the third block (Post-Training block), subjects performed pure MI tasks without the tactile sensation assistance. In contrast, in the Control-Group, subjects performed the left and right-hand MI tasks in all three blocks. Results: The performance of the Post-Training block (83.2 <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">\pm</tex-math></inline-formula> 11.4%) was significantly ( p = 0.0014) higher than that of the Pre-Training block (73.2 <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">\pm</tex-math></inline-formula> 16.3%). By contrast, in the Control-Group, no significant difference was found among the three blocks. Moreover, after the SA-MI Training, the motor-related cortex activation (i.e., ERD/ERS) and the R<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">^{2}</tex-math></inline-formula> coefficient in the alpha-beta band were enhanced, while no training effect was found in the Control-Group. Conclusion: The proposed SA-MI Training approach can significantly improve the performance of MI, which provides a novel training framework for MI-based BCI. Significance: It may be especially beneficial to those who are with difficulty in convention neurofeedback training or performing pure MI mental tasks to gain BCI control.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0018-9294
1558-2531
1558-2531
DOI:10.1109/TBME.2022.3201241