The comparison of RBV-based competitiveness of Hungarian family-owned and non-family-owned SMEs

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify the differences between Hungarian family-owned businesses (FOBs) and non-family-owned businesses (NFOBs) concerning the elements of SME competitiveness and financial performance. Design/methodology/approach The research covers the Hungarian data set o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCompetitiveness review Vol. 34; no. 7; pp. 1 - 24
Main Authors Varga, Anna Róza, Sipos, Norbert, Rideg, Andras, Lukovszki, Lívia
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Bingley Emerald Publishing Limited 23.02.2024
Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify the differences between Hungarian family-owned businesses (FOBs) and non-family-owned businesses (NFOBs) concerning the elements of SME competitiveness and financial performance. Design/methodology/approach The research covers the Hungarian data set of the Global Competitiveness Project (GCP, www.sme-gcp.org) of 738 (data collection between 2018 and 2020) non-listed SMEs, of which 328 were FOBs. The study uses the comprehensive, multidimensional competitiveness measurement of the GCP built on the resource-based view (RBV) and the configuration theory. Financial performance was captured with two composite indicators: short-term and long-term financial performance (LTFP). The comparative analysis between FOBs and NFOBs was conducted using binary logistic regression. Findings The results show that FOBs are more prone to focusing on local niche markets with higher longevity and LTFP than NFOBs. However, FOBs have lower innovation intensity and less organised administrative procedures. The most contradicting finding is that the FOBs’ higher LTFP is accompanied by significantly lower competitiveness than in the case of NFOBs. Originality/value This study goes beyond other GCP studies by including composite financial performance measures among the variables examined. The combination of performance-causing (resources and capabilities) and performance-representing (financial performance) variables provides a better understanding of the non-listed SMEs in terms of family ownership. The results help academia to enrich the RBV-competitiveness, the non-listed SME management and finance literature, and policymakers to design business development and support schemes. They also show future entrepreneurs the impact of family ownership on entrepreneurial success.
ISSN:1059-5422
1059-5422
2051-3143
DOI:10.1108/CR-02-2023-0017