Identifying and classifying family businesses

One of the main challenges facing those researching family business is that of defining what exactly constitutes a family business when considering whether family businesses and non-family businesses are different or not. Most research on the definition of family firms has been conceptual-based, and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inReview of managerial science Vol. 9; no. 3; pp. 603 - 634
Main Authors Diéguez-Soto, J., López-Delgado, P., Rojo-Ramírez, A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.07.2015
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Accounting/Auditing
Banking
Business and Management
Business Strategy/Leadership
Family owned businesses
Literature reviews
Management science
Marketing
Review Paper
Studies
Taxonomy
United States > US
L26
Profitability
Efficiency
G32
Family business identification
Leverage
Performance
Survival
L25
Family business classification
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:One of the main challenges facing those researching family business is that of defining what exactly constitutes a family business when considering whether family businesses and non-family businesses are different or not. Most research on the definition of family firms has been conceptual-based, and the choice of definition has lacked empirical support. Previous research has not yet obtained conclusive results regarding the differences between family and non-family firms. Moreover, very few countries worldwide have explicit database information to enable them to recognize family firms. This research uses an abductive method to identify family-involved firms (FIFs) with homogeneous features compared to the rest of firms regarding performance, an essential indicator of the firm’s success. Second and later generation FIFs, despite their internal differences, make up a uniform group of firms when considering several dimensions of performance (leverage, efficiency and profitability), and differ significantly from the rest of firms. At the same time we test whether entrepreneurial firms (lone- founder firms) should be considered family firms or non-family firms, according to their behavior. Results agree with making a distinction between lone-founder firms, in which no relatives are involved as internal stakeholders, and FIFs.
ISSN:1863-6683
1863-6691
DOI:10.1007/s11846-014-0128-6