Subitizing and similarity: Toward a pattern-matching theory of enumeration

• Published in: Psychonomic bulletin & review Vol. 10; no. 3; pp. 676 - 682
• Main Authors: Logan, Gordon D., Zbrodoff, N. Jane
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Austin, TX Psychonomic Society 01.09.2003
• Subjects: Biological and medical sciences; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Humans; Language; Mathematics; Miscellaneous; Models, Psychological; Psychological Theory; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Psychology. Psychophysiology; Visual Fields; Human; Enumeration; Similarity; Theory; Cognition; Experimental study; Pairing; Counting
• ISSN: 1069-9384; 1531-5320
• DOI: 10.3758/BF03196531

Pattern-matching theories of subitizing claim that subjects enumerate displays with small numerosities by retrieving numerical responses associated with similar displays experienced in the past. Such retrieval implies that displays with small numerosities are similar to other displays of the same numerosity and dissimilar to other displays of different numerosities. These hypotheses were tested by having subjects rate the similarities of displays of dot patterns with numerosities in the range of 1-10. One group of subjects rated patterns of the same numerosity. Their ratings were higher for patterns in the subitizing range (numerosities of 1-3) than for patterns beyond the subitizing range (numerosities of 4-10). Another group rated patterns of different numerosities. Their ratings were lower in the subitizing range than beyond the subitizing range. An analysis based on multidimensional scaling suggested that numerosity could be retrieved accurately for displays of 1-3 dots, but not for displays of 4-10 dots.