Platinum/graphene nanoplatelets/silicone rubber composites as polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell catalysts

The importance of carbonaceous catalyst support materials in polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) fuel cell is well known. In this study, we used two different types of commercial graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) that have respectively 181 m2/g (G1) and 745 m2/g (G2) surface areas and their pyrolyzed for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMaterials chemistry and physics Vol. 260; p. 124110
Main Authors Öztürk, Ayşenur, Özçelik, Niyazi, Yurtcan, Ayşe Bayrakçeken
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Lausanne Elsevier B.V 15.02.2021
Elsevier BV
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The importance of carbonaceous catalyst support materials in polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) fuel cell is well known. In this study, we used two different types of commercial graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) that have respectively 181 m2/g (G1) and 745 m2/g (G2) surface areas and their pyrolyzed forms with and without melamine as platinum (Pt) catalyst support. The GNPs pyrolyzed with melamine were called as M-G1, M-G2; while pyrolyzed without melamine were called as P-G1, P-G2 through the study. Solely, M-G2 sample was nitrogen (N)-doped (2.3%) via pyrolysis by means of melamine. Pt nanoparticles (NPs) were loaded on these support materials by using microwave irradiation technique. PEM fuel cell performance tests were conducted in order to determine the electrochemical activity of the Pt/GNPs catalysts along with polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) polymer as catalyst binder. Pt/G2 and Pt/M-G2 provided the better PEM fuel cell performance results according to the Pt/G1 and Pt/M-G1 with PDMS polymer. Both of Pt/M-G1/PDMS and Pt/M-G2/PDMS composites gave the lower performance values compared to their pristine cases. Beside, conventional Nafion solution was also used as catalyst binder in the content of catalyst inks of the best two catalysts (Pt/G2, Pt/M-G2). PDMS and Nafion were compared with each other in terms of PEM fuel cell performance. Based on the results (@0.6 V), Pt/G2/PDMS (531.8 mA/cm2) prevailed the Pt/G2/Nafion (473.7 mA/cm2). However, performance sequence changed inversely for the Pt/M-G2/PDMS (62.6 mA/cm2) and Pt/M-G2/Nafion (329.9 mA/cm2). The highest current density value belongs to the Pt/G2/PDMS composite. The higher surface area (for the well distribution of Pt NPs) and the larger pore volume (for the better transfer of reactant gases) provided by the G2 are effective in its superiority. Under catalyst binder mission, the high oxygen permeability and hydrophobicity of the PDMS polymer is also thought to be beneficial for the improved PEM fuel cell performance. Consequently, Pt/G2/PDMS composite is the best candidate for being high-performance catalyst/binder couple in order to be used in the cathode catalyst layer (CL) of PEM fuel cell. [Display omitted] •Graphene nanoplatelets (181; 745 m2/g) were used as PEM fuel cell catalyst support.•Graphene nanoplatelets were also pyrolyzed with and without melamine.•Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) served as catalyst binder for platinum nanoparticles.•Platinum/graphene nanoplatelets (745 m2/g)/PDMS gave the superior performance.•High oxygen permeability and hydrophobicity of PDMS improved the performance.
ISSN:0254-0584
1879-3312
DOI:10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.124110