Tree indiscernibilities, revisited

We give definitions that distinguish between two notions of indiscernibility for a set { a η ∣ η ∈ ω > ω } that saw original use in Shelah [Classification theory and the number of non-isomorphic models (revised edition). North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1990 ], which we name s - and str − indiscernibili...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inArchive for mathematical logic Vol. 53; no. 1-2; pp. 211 - 232
Main Authors Kim, Byunghan, Kim, Hyeung-Joon, Scow, Lynn
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.02.2014
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We give definitions that distinguish between two notions of indiscernibility for a set { a η ∣ η ∈ ω > ω } that saw original use in Shelah [Classification theory and the number of non-isomorphic models (revised edition). North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1990 ], which we name s - and str − indiscernibility . Using these definitions and detailed proofs, we prove s- and str-modeling theorems and give applications of these theorems. In particular, we verify a step in the argument that TP is equivalent to TP 1 or TP 2 that has not seen explication in the literature. In the Appendix, we exposit the proofs of Shelah [Classification theory and the number of non-isomorphic models (revised edition). North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1990 , App. 2.6, 2.7], expanding on the details.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0933-5846
1432-0665
DOI:10.1007/s00153-013-0363-6