Tree indiscernibilities, revisited
We give definitions that distinguish between two notions of indiscernibility for a set { a η ∣ η ∈ ω > ω } that saw original use in Shelah [Classification theory and the number of non-isomorphic models (revised edition). North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1990 ], which we name s - and str − indiscernibili...
Saved in:
Published in | Archive for mathematical logic Vol. 53; no. 1-2; pp. 211 - 232 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Berlin/Heidelberg
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
01.02.2014
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | We give definitions that distinguish between two notions of indiscernibility for a set
{
a
η
∣
η
∈
ω
>
ω
}
that saw original use in Shelah [Classification theory and the number of non-isomorphic models (revised edition). North-Holland, Amsterdam,
1990
], which we name
s
- and
str
−
indiscernibility
. Using these definitions and detailed proofs, we prove s- and str-modeling theorems and give applications of these theorems. In particular, we verify a step in the argument that TP is equivalent to TP
1
or TP
2
that has not seen explication in the literature. In the Appendix, we exposit the proofs of Shelah [Classification theory and the number of non-isomorphic models (revised edition). North-Holland, Amsterdam,
1990
, App. 2.6, 2.7], expanding on the details. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0933-5846 1432-0665 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00153-013-0363-6 |