AI Body Composition in Lung Cancer Screening: Added Value Beyond Lung Cancer Detection

Background An artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm has been developed for fully automated body composition assessment of lung cancer screening noncontrast low-dose CT of the chest (LDCT) scans, but the utility of these measurements in disease risk prediction models has not been assessed. Purpose T...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRadiology Vol. 308; no. 1; p. e222937
Main Authors Xu, Kaiwen, Khan, Mirza S, Li, Thomas Z, Gao, Riqiang, Terry, James G, Huo, Yuankai, Lasko, Thomas A, Carr, John Jeffrey, Maldonado, Fabien, Landman, Bennett A, Sandler, Kim L
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Radiological Society of North America 01.07.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background An artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm has been developed for fully automated body composition assessment of lung cancer screening noncontrast low-dose CT of the chest (LDCT) scans, but the utility of these measurements in disease risk prediction models has not been assessed. Purpose To evaluate the added value of CT-based AI-derived body composition measurements in risk prediction of lung cancer incidence, lung cancer death, cardiovascular disease (CVD) death, and all-cause mortality in the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST). Materials and Methods In this secondary analysis of the NLST, body composition measurements, including area and attenuation attributes of skeletal muscle and subcutaneous adipose tissue, were derived from baseline LDCT examinations by using a previously developed AI algorithm. The added value of these measurements was assessed with sex- and cause-specific Cox proportional hazards models with and without the AI-derived body composition measurements for predicting lung cancer incidence, lung cancer death, CVD death, and all-cause mortality. Models were adjusted for confounding variables including age; body mass index; quantitative emphysema; coronary artery calcification; history of diabetes, heart disease, hypertension, and stroke; and other PLCO lung cancer risk factors. Goodness-of-fit improvements were assessed with the likelihood ratio test. Results Among 20 768 included participants (median age, 61 years [IQR, 57-65 years]; 12 317 men), 865 were diagnosed with lung cancer and 4180 died during follow-up. Including the AI-derived body composition measurements improved risk prediction for lung cancer death (male participants: χ = 23.09, < .001; female participants: χ = 15.04, = .002), CVD death (males: χ = 69.94, < .001; females: χ = 16.60, < .001), and all-cause mortality (males: χ = 248.13, < .001; females: χ = 94.54, < .001), but not for lung cancer incidence (male participants: χ = 2.53, = .11; female participants: χ = 1.73, = .19). Conclusion The body composition measurements automatically derived from baseline low-dose CT examinations added predictive value for lung cancer death, CVD death, and all-cause death, but not for lung cancer incidence in the NLST. Clinical trial registration no. NCT00047385 © RSNA, 2023 See also the editorial by Fintelmann in this issue.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Author contributions: Guarantor of integrity of entire study, K.L.S.; study concepts/study design or data acquisition or data analysis/interpretation, all authors; manuscript drafting or manuscript revision for important intellectual content, all authors; approval of final version of submitted manuscript, all authors; agrees to ensure any questions related to the work are appropriately resolved, all authors; literature research, K.X., M.S.K., R.G., J.G.T., K.L.S.; clinical studies, J.J.C.; experimental studies, K.X., T.Z.L., Y.H., T.A.L., J.J.C., F.M., B.A.L.; statistical analysis, K.X., M.S.K., T.Z.L., Y.H., T.A.L., F.M., B.A.L.; and manuscript editing, all authors
ISSN:0033-8419
1527-1315
1527-1315
DOI:10.1148/radiol.222937