A Heat–Viscoelastic Structure Interaction Model with Neumann and Dirichlet Boundary Control at the Interface: Optimal Regularity, Control Theoretic Implications
We consider a heat–structure interaction model where the structure is subject to viscoelastic (strong) damping, and where a (boundary) control acts at the interface between the two media in Neumann-type or Dirichlet-type conditions. For the boundary (interface) homogeneous case, the free dynamics ge...
Saved in:
Published in | Applied mathematics & optimization Vol. 73; no. 3; pp. 571 - 594 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York
Springer US
01.06.2016
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | We consider a heat–structure interaction model where the structure is subject to viscoelastic (strong) damping, and where a (boundary) control acts at the interface between the two media in Neumann-type or Dirichlet-type conditions. For the boundary (interface)
homogeneous
case, the free dynamics generates a s.c. contraction semigroup which, moreover, is analytic on the energy space and exponentially stable here Lasiecka et al. (Pure Appl Anal, to appear). If
A
is the free dynamics operator, and
B
N
is the (unbounded) control operator in the case of Neumann control acting at the interface, it is shown that
A
-
1
2
B
N
is a bounded operator from the interface measured in the
L
2
-norm to the energy space. We reduce this problem to finding a characterization, or at least a suitable subspace, of the domain of the square root
(
-
A
)
1
/
2
, i.e.,
D
(
(
-
A
)
1
/
2
)
, where
A
has highly coupled boundary conditions at the interface. To this end, here we prove that
D
(
(
-
A
)
1
2
)
≡
D
(
(
-
A
∗
)
1
2
)
≡
V
, with the space
V
explicitly characterized also in terms of the surviving boundary conditions. Thus, this physical model provides an example of a matrix-valued operator with highly coupled boundary conditions at the interface, where the so called Kato problem has a positive answer. (The well-known sufficient condition Lions in J Math Soc JAPAN 14(2):233–241,
1962
, Theorem 6.1 is not applicable.) After this result, some critical consequences follow for the model under study. We explicitly note here three of them: (i) optimal (parabolic-type) boundary
→
interior regularity with boundary control at the interface; (ii) optimal boundary control theory for the corresponding quadratic cost problem; (iii) min–max game theory problem with control/disturbance acting at the interface. On the other hand, if
B
D
is the (unbounded) control operator in the case of Dirichlet control acting at the interface, it is then shown here that
A
-
1
B
D
is a bounded operator from the interface measured this time in the
H
1
2
-norm to the energy space. Similar consequences follow. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0095-4616 1432-0606 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00245-016-9348-2 |