On the influence of gas-liquid two-phase flow on Lorentz force velocimetry

• Published in: Measurement science & technology Vol. 29; no. 8; pp. 85301 - 85311
• Main Authors: Wiederhold, A, Resagk, C, Cierpka, C
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: IOP Publishing 01.08.2018
• Subjects: bubbly flow; force measurement; Lorentz force velocimetry; slug flow; two-phase flow
• ISSN: 0957-0233; 1361-6501
• DOI: 10.1088/1361-6501/aaca8a

Lorentz force velocimetry (LFV) is a contactless and non-invasive flow measurement technique for electrical conducting fluids. When the fluid passes a magnetic field, a Lorentz force will be generated. The force is proportional to the electrical conductivity, to the velocity of the fluid, and to the square of the magnetic flux density. It is possible to apply this technique over a range of conductivities varying from high values as for liquid metals to lower values as typically for electrolytes (e.g. salt water). The main challenge is measuring the force, which is six orders of magnitude smaller for electrolytes in comparison to liquid metals. It was shown that LFV is insensitive to the shape of different velocity profiles and especially to strongly asymmetric profiles as long as the volume flow is constant. However, the influence of a second gaseous phase on the force signal remains an open question. This is of fundamental interest especially for chemical and food processing industries. To examine this influence in detail, electrolyte flow with different volume flow fractions was investigated for the current study. By using frits, it is possible to generate a homogeneous distribution of the second (gaseous) phase in the electrolyte. Small electrolyte velocities or flow rates (v  <  1.5 m s−1,   = 225 l min−1) enable the formation of slug flow and stratified wavy flow, and higher velocities (v  >  1.8 m s−1,   =  270 l min−1) the formation of bubbly two-phase flow in the used test section. By this means, it is possible to study a wide range of flow patterns in a horizontal duct. The experimental results are in good agreement with the analytical estimations for fully dispersed flow. However, for a nonhomogeneous distribution of air the force signal deviates much stronger. An explanation can be the superposition of Lorentz forces and magnetic forces, caused by differences of the magnetic susceptibilities of water and air, which will be discussed in greater detail.