Possibilities of some methods for risk assessment of arsenic load in soils

The aim of this research was to select and test the best analytical method to assess As concentrations in soil. A sample set of 6 heavily contaminated soils was examined. As shown by our results, the best method was to combine simple 1M NH4NO3 extraction with the determination of amorphous Fe forms...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPlant, soil and environment Vol. 54; no. 7; pp. 279 - 287
Main Authors Vacha, R.,Vyzkumny Ustav Melioraci a Ochrany Pudy, Prague (Czech Republic), Macurova, H.,Vyzkumny Ustav Melioraci a Ochrany Pudy, Prague (Czech Republic), Skala, J.,Vyzkumny Ustav Melioraci a Ochrany Pudy, Prague (Czech Republic), Havelkova, M.,Vyzkumny Ustav Melioraci a Ochrany Pudy, Prague (Czech Republic), Cechmankova, J.,Vyzkumny Ustav Melioraci a Ochrany Pudy, Prague (Czech Republic), Horvathova, V.,Vyzkumny Ustav Melioraci a Ochrany Pudy, Prague (Czech Republic)
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences 01.07.2008
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The aim of this research was to select and test the best analytical method to assess As concentrations in soil. A sample set of 6 heavily contaminated soils was examined. As shown by our results, the best method was to combine simple 1M NH4NO3 extraction with the determination of amorphous Fe forms (the Tamm method).
Bibliography:T01
2009000149
http://journals.uzpi.cz:8050/uniqueFiles/01713.pdf
ISSN:1214-1178
1805-9368
DOI:10.17221/419-PSE