Efficacy and safety of anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve for distal humerus fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to summarize available evidence of anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve for patients with distal humerus fractures. The databases were searched from PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in surgery Vol. 9; p. 1005200
Main Authors Li, Ting, Yan, Jingxin, Ren, Qiuyu, Hu, Jiang, Wang, Fei, Xiao, Chengwei, Liu, Xilin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 06.01.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to summarize available evidence of anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve for patients with distal humerus fractures. The databases were searched from PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chongqing VIP Database (VIP), and Wan Fang Database up to June 2022. The clinical outcome included operation time, fracture healing time, hospital stays, elbow joint function, and ulnar neuritis rate. Statistical analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.3 (Cochrane Collaboration). A total of 17 studies were included (8 RCTs and 9 retrospective studies), and 1280 patients were analyzed. The results of this meta-analysis showed anterior transposition group had longer operation time (MD = 20.35 min, 95%CI: 12.56-28.14,  < 0.00001). There was no significant difference in fracture healing time (SMD = -0.50, 95%CI: -1.50-0.50,  = 0.33), hospital stays (MD = -1.23 days, 95%CI: -2.72--0.27,  = 0.11), blood loss (MD = 2.66 ml, 95%CI: -2.45-7.76,  = 0.31), and ulnar neuritis rate (OR = 1.23, 95%CI: 0.63-2.42,  = 0.54) between two groups. Finally, elbow joint motion, elbow joint function, fracture nonunion, and post-operative infection (  > 0.05) between two groups were not significantly statistic difference. This meta-analysis showed that anterior transposition group is not superior to non-transposition group for patients with distal humerus fractures without ulnar nerve injury. On the contrary, non-transposition group have shorter operation time than that of anterior transposition group. Non-transposition group did not increase the post-operative ulnar neuritis rate. Therefore, both anterior transposition group and non- transposition group are the treatment options for patients with distal humerus fractures without ulnar nerve injury. Besides, these findings need to be further verified by multi-center, double-blind, and large sample RCTs.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
Edited by: Federico Canavese, Centre Hospitalier Regional et Universitaire de Lille, France
Specialty Section: This article was submitted to Orthopedic Surgery, a section of the journal Frontiers in Surgery
Reviewed by: Osvaldo Mazza, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital (IRCCS), Italy Yejun ZHA, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, China
These authors share first authorship
ISSN:2296-875X
2296-875X
DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2022.1005200