Enhanced air quality prediction by edge-based spatiotemporal data preprocessing

• Published in: Computers & electrical engineering Vol. 96; p. 107572
• Main Authors: Ojagh, Soroush, Cauteruccio, Francesco, Terracina, Giorgio, Liang, Steve H.L.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Amsterdam Elsevier Ltd 01.12.2021; Elsevier BV
• Subjects: Air monitoring; Air pollution; Air quality; Air quality IoT sensors; Data preprocessing; Dynamic time warping; Internet of Things; Long short term memory; Micrometers; PM2.5 prediction; Pollutants; Preprocessing; Sensors; Spatiotemporal data; Air quality IoT sensors; Data preprocessing; Dynamic time warping; PM2.5 prediction; Long short term memory
• ISSN: 0045-7906; 1879-0755
• DOI: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107572

Particulate matter with a diameter less than 2.5 micrometers (PM2.5) can be considered as the most dangerous air pollutant that affects human health. In addition, technological advances, such as those involving the Internet of Things (IoT) for monitoring air quality, have made it possible to monitor air quality for a lower cost. However, missing values and noisy data make nonlinear data provided by air quality IoT sensors less reliable and more complicated than data provided by air quality monitoring stations. In this study, we propose a mixed edge-based and cloud-based framework with the final goal of PM2.5 value prediction. In order to validate the proposed approach, we evaluate the quality of predictions using both original and preprocessed data on a real-world dataset from air quality sensors distributed in Calgary, Canada. Obtained results show an average improvement of 40.18% of the prediction accuracy on Mean Absolute Percentage Error by using the proposed preprocessing technique. •PM2.5 is predicted using IoT sensors and deep learning methods with lower cost.•Preprocessing is required for raw IoT sensor data to achieve better predictions.•Missing values are estimated in the edge using spatial and temporal parameters.•Preprocessed data produced more precise PM2.5 predictions than unprocessed data. [Display omitted]