An application of the mixed‐effects model and pattern mixture model to treatment groups with differential missingness suspected not‐missing‐at‐random

Summary Likelihood‐based, mixed‐effects models for repeated measures (MMRMs) are occasionally used in primary analyses for group comparisons of incomplete continuous longitudinal data. Although MMRM analysis is generally valid under missing‐at‐random assumptions, it is invalid under not‐missing‐at‐r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPharmaceutical statistics : the journal of the pharmaceutical industry Vol. 20; no. 1; pp. 93 - 108
Main Authors Gosho, Masahiko, Maruo, Kazushi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.01.2021
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1539-1604
1539-1612
1539-1612
DOI10.1002/pst.2058

Cover

More Information
Summary:Summary Likelihood‐based, mixed‐effects models for repeated measures (MMRMs) are occasionally used in primary analyses for group comparisons of incomplete continuous longitudinal data. Although MMRM analysis is generally valid under missing‐at‐random assumptions, it is invalid under not‐missing‐at‐random (NMAR) assumptions. We consider the possibility of bias of estimated treatment effect using standard MMRM analysis in a motivational case, and propose simple and easily implementable pattern mixture models within the framework of mixed‐effects modeling, to handle the NMAR data with differential missingness between treatment groups. The proposed models are a new form of pattern mixture model that employ a categorical time variable when modeling the outcome and a continuous time variable when modeling the missingness‐data patterns. The models can directly provide an overall estimate of the treatment effect of interest using the average of the distribution of the missingness indicator and a categorical time variable in the same manner as MMRM analysis. Our simulation results indicate that the bias of the treatment effect for MMRM analysis was considerably larger than that for the pattern mixture model analysis under NMAR assumptions. In the case study, it would be dangerous to interpret only the results of the MMRM analysis, and the proposed pattern mixture model would be useful as a sensitivity analysis for treatment effect evaluation.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1539-1604
1539-1612
1539-1612
DOI:10.1002/pst.2058